There is growing optimism among investors despite possibility of overall contraction
Multi-sector economy:
Malaysia’s economic performance has been strong, and it is often
recognised as among the emerging economies that will have a prominent
role on the world stage in the coming years.
KUALA LUMPUR: The new year is just around the corner. In many ways, it will be
a relief to say farewell to 2012, a year which has seen the advanced
countries struggling amid seemingly unending economic and financial
uncertainty.
Naturally, the tail-end of the year is a time to
look ahead with hope and expectation. And indeed, there is growing
optimism among investors about the global economy. However, is this
realistic when some experts refuse to rule out the possibility of an
overall contraction?
When presenting its Economic Outlook in
late November, the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and
Development (OECD) warned that the global economy was expected to make
“a hesitant and uneven recovery” over the coming two years.
OECD secretary-general Angel Gurra
pointed out that we were not yet out of the woods. “The near-term
outlook is not only weak, but also downside risks predominate. The
lingering euro-area crisis remains a serious threat to the world
economy. At the same time, if left unresolved, the US fiscal cliff'
could tip the US economy into recession and weigh on global growth,” he
added.
The eurozone is expected to see a 0.4% contraction this
year and a further 0.1% fall in 2013. Even if the White House and
congressional leaders can hammer out a short-term agreement on the
budget that will avoid the fiscal cliff, growth in the United States is
forecast to grow at 2% next year, down from the 2.6% forecasted in May.
With
the United States and Europe battling to revive their economies, the
OECD believes the world economy will grow by 3.4% in 2013, up from 2.9%
this year.
This will likely be supported by the economic
expansion of the likes of China, Brazil and India, although they too
will be impacted by challenges faced in the West.
Malaysia
too will contribute to this forward momentum. Its economic performance
has been strong, and it is often recognised as among the emerging
economies that will have a prominent role on the world stage in the
coming years.
The recent Country Brand Index (CBI) 2012-13, for
example, ranks Malaysia as third among the Future 15 tomorrow's leading
country brands that have “great potential across a variety of areas”.
Constructed
annually by global brand consultancy FutureBrand, the CBI measures and
ranks global perceptions around the world's nations based on elements
such as their cultures, industries, economic vitality and public policy
initiatives.
Economic reforms
This year is the
first time that the index report incorporate the Future 15, which
reflects six future drivers: governance, investment, human capital,
growth, sustainability and influence.
Published last October, the CBI 2012-13 report notes: “Malaysia's workforce, tourism and vast resources may just be the secret to its success.”
That,
of course, is not the full picture. A key component of the Malaysian
success story has been the sound implementation of economic reforms
since the nation's independence that has transformed an exporter of raw
materials into an emerging, multi-sector economy driven by exports and
supported by a well-developed regulatory system.
Forward-looking
planning has enabled the Government to capitalise on the country's
unique offering, including a rich heritage and scenic landscapes, to
support a thriving tourism sector. Home to more than 15% of the world's
species, Malaysia is one of the world's most bio-diverse areas.
The current emphasis is on climbing the the economic ladder, and this is done via Government-led initiatives such as the Government Transformation Programme (GTP) and the Economic Transformation Programme (ETP), and a conscious effort to slowly liberalise sub-sectors of our economy.
Also
crucial are a focus on building on the country's vast natural
resources, a commitment to economic openness, and a concerted effort to
drive investments in infrastructure and research and development. These
are complemented by the encouragement of innovation in business and
amongst the workforce, and the development of regional alliances.
Malaysia's
economy has been resilient amid the challenging global economic
conditions, with real gross domestic (GDP) product growth estimated at
5.1% this year and 5% in 2013, according to the World Bank.
Its
third-quarter performance surprised on the upside with GDP expansion
beating economists' median expectations of 4.8%; year-on-year growth in
the quarter was 5.2%, with domestic demand fuelling economic activity
and compensating for the slower export demand from major trading
partners affected by the ongoing economic woes.
Domestic demand
in the third quarter continued to experience double-digit growth,
increasing 11.4% from a year ago. The impetus for this was supplied by
strong public and private sector investment.
Private investments
were primarily driven by capital spending in the services sector,
particularly in transportation, real estate and utilities, while public
investments were mainly capital spending by public enterprises in
transportation, oil and gas, education and utilities.
Endless possibilities
Commenting
on Malaysia's third-quarter performance, Alliance Research chief
economist Manokaran Mottain said the economy was still driven by
domestic demand, led by private consumption and investment activities,
which reflected the Government's drive to stimulate income growth,
improve and develop infrastructure, and ensure a steady flow of foreign
capital.
However, Bank Negara governor Tan Sri Dr Zeti Akhtar Aziz
cautioned that although GDP growth in the fourth quarter was likely to
continue that of the third quarter, there were some uncertainties in the
export sector. The central bank estimates that growth for the whole of
2012 will be at least 5%.
The experts are cautiously confident about Malaysia maintaining its economic performance in 2013. The recent Malaysia Economic Monitor,
a report by the World Bank, said Malaysia's growth would likely weather
a weak global environment and would grow robustly in 2013.
Public
and private investments are expected to remain strong and lend support
to economic growth in the new year. Private investment is forecasted to
grow at 13.3% in 2013, up from 11.7% in 2012, driven by the rollout of
the ETP. Public investment is forecasted to expand by 4.2% in 2013, as a
result of higher capital outlays by non-financial public enterprises
and development expenditure by the Federal Government .
The
Finance Ministry has said the prospects for the services sector are
expected to remain upbeat with the accelerated implementation of key
initiatives under the National Key Results Area and continued investment
in the seven services sub-sectors under the National Key Economic Areas.
These
initiatives are geared towards driving the wholesale and retail trade,
finance and insurance, and communication sub-sectors, which are
forecasted to grow 6.8%, 5.2% and 8.2% in 2013.
Though the United
States and Europe have some way to go before they can again enjoy
pre-crisis growth rates, Malaysia looks set to stay on its stable
trajectory of growth, benefiting from wise economic planning and a
steady pace of growth.
A bright future lies ahead for Malaysia, a
nation earmarked to become a force that will reshape the global
landscape of tomorrow. As the country plays an increasingly important
role, it will no doubt offer Malaysians and the world a destination for
growth and endless possibilities.
By News Desk
The Star/Asia News Network
Related posts
Malaysia's GDP growth dips to 5.2% in Q3, beats economists' forecast ...
Penang's economy growth declines to 1.8% in 9 months
US Fiscal Cliff poses threat to economy worldwide!
ASEAN plans world's largest trading bloc in Asia, the RCEP vs secretive TPP...
Share This
Monday, December 24, 2012
Sunday, December 23, 2012
Singapore start-ups struggle to woo investors, failure to launch
Singapore's decade-long push to become a hotbed for entrepreneurs is stuck at stage one.
The city-state of 5.3 million people ranks No. 1 in the world in ease of doing business and fourth in starting one, according to a World Bank study. It offers low taxes, easy-to-obtain seed money to start a business, and a well-educated, English-speaking workforce in the gateway to Asia.
It just takes one day and S$315 ($260) to register a business in Singapore. Yet, the country has struggled to attract international investment money for its own start-ups.
Venture capital firms are put off by the small size of the market, lack of big ideas that can be a global success and an uncertain exit strategy. Only 50 out of 301 venture capital firms based in Singapore are interested in local investment, according to the Asian Venture Capital Journal Research.
Of the 70 high tech start-ups the government has invested in over the past two years, just 10 received follow-on private funding from investors locally and abroad, according to the National Research Foundation, the government arm responsible for research and development.
"There is a real shortage of venture capital firms investing in Series A in Singapore," said Leslie Loh, an entrepreneur-turned-investor, referring to the first round of funds raised by start-ups after seed capital.
"VCs are looking at countries like India and China where there is a larger domestic market."
Only 2 percent (about $15 million) of the total venture capital investment in Asia is aimed at Singapore, according to Asian Venture Capital Journal Research's data for 2012. Japan,
China and India topped the list of big VC investments in Asia.
"In the early stage there is a big push (by the government). But if you look at the whole ecosystem for helping companies grow, there is a gap in the growth stage," said Wong Poh Kam, a professor at National University of Singapore's business school.
"For a Singapore company to be able to achieve global success, it needs to have sufficient follow-on venture capital funding."
CHICKEN-AND-EGG PROBLEM
Pampered by government funds at the early stage, when start-ups can tap up to S$500,000 in grants, companies are finding it hard when they go looking for millions of dollars from venture capital firms for Series A funds.
Of the 374 venture capital investments in Asia in 2012, Singapore accounted for just 24, according to AVCJ Research.
"If there are no success stories, VCs do not think there is a compelling reason to be here," said Wong.
But that success depends on big money from venture capital firms, leaving start-ups stuck in a vicious cycle.
Andrew Roth, co-founder of Perx, which makes a digital loyalty card application, said one of the first questions he heard from investors when he went looking for funding was, "What is your net operating income?"
Roth says he would not have been asked that question if he was in Silicon Valley, where investors care more about the functioning of the product and its ability to gain scale.
"The mindset has to change," said Roth, who is currently in the process of raising a second round of funds from individual investors and funds. "It is a younger ecosystem so investors are so much more risk averse."
THE 'A' CRUNCH
Singapore start-ups are also forced to think globally right from day one as a product aimed at a small domestic audience is not going to bring them a lot of success.
Henn Tan, head of Trek 2000 International Ltd, the company that introduced the ThumbDrive USB flash drive in 2000 and ranks among the few globally known success stories of Singapore, said it is difficult for Singapore to produce entrepreneurs.
"Because fellow Singaporeans are being subjected to regimented life from early years...there are too many rules and regulations for the young generation to think out of the box without being reprimanded," Tan said.
The problem of raising funds beyond the government-created cocoon raises the question of whether its involvement in the start-up scene is actually a good thing.
Some think the government initiatives allow undeserving start-ups to get easy money, while others say the lack of private funds just proves that the government has to be active in providing a catalyst to start-ups and entrepreneurs.
The government says it needs to support start-ups at the early stage because that's where the most risk exists.
"When the landscape is one which sees the vibrancy that you see in California and where multitudes of VCs have taken root and (are) able to manage a portfolio from early stage to growth stage to pre-IPO, then we can take a step back," said Low Teck Seng, CEO of the National Research Foundation.
But he also warned against too much government involvement. "If the government funds what the industry thinks is not worth funding, then we will not be doing justice to public funds."
IDEAL ENVIRONMENT
Other than state-run or state-backed companies such as Singapore Airlines Ltd and Keppel Corp Ltd, the world's largest oil rig builder, there are only a few big home-grown companies from Singapore.
There was Creative Technologies Ltd, whose PC audio cards, speakers and MP3 players were a hit in the early 2000s, but it fell out of favour with increasing competition. The company has posted 21 straight quarters of losses and voluntarily delisted itself from the Nasdaq in 2007.
For Perx's Roth, who moved from New Jersey to Singapore to start his company, the attraction is the presence of global firms that set up an Asian base here, providing a steady stream of potential customers.
The fact that Singapore is home to high-flying business executives also helps. Facebook co-founder Eduardo Saverin invested in Perx early on. He sits on Perx's board, and meets with Roth and his team once a month, Roth said.
"It's hard for Singapore to claim to be an entrepreneur hub for (the) whole of Asia," said NUS's Wong. "A more realistic target would be for Southeast Asia." ($1 = 1.2182 Singapore dollars)
(Editing by Emily Kaiser) (Reuters)
The city-state of 5.3 million people ranks No. 1 in the world in ease of doing business and fourth in starting one, according to a World Bank study. It offers low taxes, easy-to-obtain seed money to start a business, and a well-educated, English-speaking workforce in the gateway to Asia.
It just takes one day and S$315 ($260) to register a business in Singapore. Yet, the country has struggled to attract international investment money for its own start-ups.
Venture capital firms are put off by the small size of the market, lack of big ideas that can be a global success and an uncertain exit strategy. Only 50 out of 301 venture capital firms based in Singapore are interested in local investment, according to the Asian Venture Capital Journal Research.
Of the 70 high tech start-ups the government has invested in over the past two years, just 10 received follow-on private funding from investors locally and abroad, according to the National Research Foundation, the government arm responsible for research and development.
"There is a real shortage of venture capital firms investing in Series A in Singapore," said Leslie Loh, an entrepreneur-turned-investor, referring to the first round of funds raised by start-ups after seed capital.
"VCs are looking at countries like India and China where there is a larger domestic market."
Only 2 percent (about $15 million) of the total venture capital investment in Asia is aimed at Singapore, according to Asian Venture Capital Journal Research's data for 2012. Japan,
China and India topped the list of big VC investments in Asia.
"In the early stage there is a big push (by the government). But if you look at the whole ecosystem for helping companies grow, there is a gap in the growth stage," said Wong Poh Kam, a professor at National University of Singapore's business school.
"For a Singapore company to be able to achieve global success, it needs to have sufficient follow-on venture capital funding."
CHICKEN-AND-EGG PROBLEM
Pampered by government funds at the early stage, when start-ups can tap up to S$500,000 in grants, companies are finding it hard when they go looking for millions of dollars from venture capital firms for Series A funds.
Of the 374 venture capital investments in Asia in 2012, Singapore accounted for just 24, according to AVCJ Research.
"If there are no success stories, VCs do not think there is a compelling reason to be here," said Wong.
But that success depends on big money from venture capital firms, leaving start-ups stuck in a vicious cycle.
Andrew Roth, co-founder of Perx, which makes a digital loyalty card application, said one of the first questions he heard from investors when he went looking for funding was, "What is your net operating income?"
Roth says he would not have been asked that question if he was in Silicon Valley, where investors care more about the functioning of the product and its ability to gain scale.
"The mindset has to change," said Roth, who is currently in the process of raising a second round of funds from individual investors and funds. "It is a younger ecosystem so investors are so much more risk averse."
THE 'A' CRUNCH
Singapore start-ups are also forced to think globally right from day one as a product aimed at a small domestic audience is not going to bring them a lot of success.
Henn Tan, head of Trek 2000 International Ltd, the company that introduced the ThumbDrive USB flash drive in 2000 and ranks among the few globally known success stories of Singapore, said it is difficult for Singapore to produce entrepreneurs.
"Because fellow Singaporeans are being subjected to regimented life from early years...there are too many rules and regulations for the young generation to think out of the box without being reprimanded," Tan said.
The problem of raising funds beyond the government-created cocoon raises the question of whether its involvement in the start-up scene is actually a good thing.
Some think the government initiatives allow undeserving start-ups to get easy money, while others say the lack of private funds just proves that the government has to be active in providing a catalyst to start-ups and entrepreneurs.
The government says it needs to support start-ups at the early stage because that's where the most risk exists.
"When the landscape is one which sees the vibrancy that you see in California and where multitudes of VCs have taken root and (are) able to manage a portfolio from early stage to growth stage to pre-IPO, then we can take a step back," said Low Teck Seng, CEO of the National Research Foundation.
But he also warned against too much government involvement. "If the government funds what the industry thinks is not worth funding, then we will not be doing justice to public funds."
IDEAL ENVIRONMENT
Other than state-run or state-backed companies such as Singapore Airlines Ltd and Keppel Corp Ltd, the world's largest oil rig builder, there are only a few big home-grown companies from Singapore.
There was Creative Technologies Ltd, whose PC audio cards, speakers and MP3 players were a hit in the early 2000s, but it fell out of favour with increasing competition. The company has posted 21 straight quarters of losses and voluntarily delisted itself from the Nasdaq in 2007.
For Perx's Roth, who moved from New Jersey to Singapore to start his company, the attraction is the presence of global firms that set up an Asian base here, providing a steady stream of potential customers.
The fact that Singapore is home to high-flying business executives also helps. Facebook co-founder Eduardo Saverin invested in Perx early on. He sits on Perx's board, and meets with Roth and his team once a month, Roth said.
"It's hard for Singapore to claim to be an entrepreneur hub for (the) whole of Asia," said NUS's Wong. "A more realistic target would be for Southeast Asia." ($1 = 1.2182 Singapore dollars)
(Editing by Emily Kaiser) (Reuters)
Saturday, December 22, 2012
Regulate property management! Forum on Strata Management in Penang
The issue of the Board of Valuers, Appraisers and Estate Agents (BVAEA) seeking to regulate property management is controversial. Since the BVAEA is a body under the Finance Ministry, isn’t it odd that the Finance Ministry rather than the Housing Ministry is trying to regulate property management?
Most people have a pretty good idea about the job of a property manager and would conclude that it is a generalist’s job.
There should not be too many restrictions attached to a generalist’s job, such as that of a sales manager or a supermarket manager.
The opinion of HBA honorary secretary-general Chang Kim Loong on the role of a property manager is a bit overstated.
Property managers are at all times employees of MCs and JMBs and never the other way round.
Lives and property worth millions of ringgit are the prime responsibilities of employers and not the employees.
It is an exaggeration to say that lives and property worth millions are being entrusted to property managers to care, control and manage.
However, it may be a good idea to regulate the property manager’s job, but it would be more appropriate if it came under a board in the Housing Ministry with input from engineers and architects.
It would be less appropriate to come under a board in the Finance Ministry, as property management has more to do with building than finance.
By A CONCERNED CITIZEN Kuala Lumpur
Forum on strata management
A SEMINAR on the Strata Management Bill 2012 as well as the Strata Titles (Amendment) Act 2012 will be held at Auditorium C and F, Level 5, Komtar, from 10am to 4pm on Jan 13.
Komtar assemblyman Ng Wei Aik said many people were unaware of the new bill’s contents, including how to handle strata management disputes.
“The bill provides better protection for property owners. It is important that they know their rights,” he said at a press conference.
He said lawyer Lee Khai would talk on the application of the Strata Management Bill while licensed land surveyor Chuang Kuang Han would talk on Strata Titles Application and Problematic Cases.
Registration fee is RM30 per person which includes buffet lunch and lecture notes.
The public, including management corporations, joint management bodies and residents associations are invited to attend.
For more details, contact Ng’s service centre at 04-2270215/017-4108914/012-4290163, fax 04-2278215 or e-mail dapkomtar308@gmail.com before Jan 8.
Related posts:
With more and more people living in
stratified buildings, the new Strata Management Act is timely in
helping to reduce animosity among res...
Good property management, maintenance add value 25 Nov 2012
Is property building management a professional? 08 Nov 2012
Managing strata properties in Malaysia Sep 11, 2012
World's Simplest Management Secret 08 Nov 2012
Is property building management a professional? 08 Nov 2012
Managing strata properties in Malaysia Sep 11, 2012
World's Simplest Management Secret 08 Nov 2012
An American-Made Business Model Has Less Success Overseas
For
years, the titans of finance have held out the promise that they could
export their business model overseas and mint billions in the process.
Yet, there are increasing signs that global deal-making was always a
myth.
If you’ve been anywhere near a Wall Street conference in the last five years, you know the drill. Deal makers bemoan the United States as a mature and overregulated economy. They talk about heading abroad, as emerging market economies leave us far behind. To listen to them, one might think the rest of the world was a paradise out of “Atlas Shrugged,” where capital flows and where private equity, investment banks and other investors can freely seek opportunities.
So what country is No. 1 in initial public offerings so far this year? Yes, it is the United States, according to Renaissance Capital, with 75 I.P.O.’s raising $39 billion in total. Compare this activity with China, where 41 I.P.O.’s raised just $8.1 billion.
M&AS
And in mergers and acquisitions? Again, it is the United States, with 53 percent of the worldwide deal volume, up from 51 percent from last year, according to Dealogic. For investment banks, this means that the United States has a 46 percent share of the $63 billion in worldwide investment banking revenue, up from 34.6 percent in 2009.
With the slowdown in once-hot emerging markets, the tide is going out, baring all of the problems and issues associated with global deal-making.
China is a prime example. Huge amounts of foreign and state investment produced an economic miracle. And in that time, wealth was there to be had.
But let’s be clear about where that wealth came from. In the United States, deal makers make money primarily by buying underperforming assets, adding some financial wizardry and riding any improvements in the stock market. Sometimes, they get lucky by making a quick profit, but often private equity works to squeeze out inefficiencies and make operating improvements in companies and then takes them public a few years later.
China's situation
In China, what increasingly appears to have been a stock market and asset bubble spurred by hundreds of billions in direct investment has created some spectacular early profits for deal makers. The private equity firm Carlyle Group, for example, has made an estimated $4.4 billion on an investment in China Pacific Insurance, which it took public on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange.
But now, with the Chinese I.P.O. market at a virtual standstill and the Shanghai market down more than 30 percent from its high last year, that avenue to riches is over. People are starting to say that investment in China resembles a “No Exit” sign.
Deal makers are left with a back-to-basics approach that looks to make money from companies through economic growth or improving their performance. Yet most of these investments are made with state actors and minority positions, meaning that there may be little opportunity to actually do anything more than sit and wait and hope. And you know what they say about hope as a strategy.
It appears that deal makers are starting to realize the problem. Foreign direct investment in China was down 3.67 percent from last year to $9.6 billion, and it is likely to remain on a downward trend.
And China has been among the friendliest places for deal makers. Other emerging markets have been less accommodating. Take India, which has been criticized for excessive regulation, high taxes and ownership prohibitions. David Bonderman, the head of the private equity giant TPG Capital, recently said that “we stay away from places that have impossible governments and impossible tax regimes, which means sayonara to India.”
Foreign issues
The comment about India highlights another problem with foreign deal-making: it’s foreign. Sometimes, the political winds change and local governments that initially welcomed investment change their minds.
South Korea, for example, invited foreign capital to invest in its battered financial sector after the Asian currency crisis. But when Lone Star Investments was about to reap billions in profits on an investment in Korea Exchange Bank, a legal battle almost a decade long erupted as Korean government officials accused the fund of vulture investing.
And the political problems are sometimes not directed at foreign investors. South Africa, for example, is undergoing the kind of political turmoil that can stop all foreign investment in its tracks over treatment of its workers and continuing income inequality. Things are not much better in the more mature economies.
Economic doldrums
Europe is in the economic doldrums, and its governments are increasingly protectionist of both jobs and industry. France, for example, recently threatened to nationalize a factory owned by ArcelorMittal, which sought to shut down two furnaces.
The national minister said the company was “not welcome.” It’s hard to see a deal maker profiting from buying an inefficient enterprise that it can’t clean up without risking national censure.
Buying at a low is the lifeblood of any investment strategy — but this assumes that there will be an uptick, and on the Continent, that is uncertain given the state of Greece and the other indebted economies in Southern Europe.
This is all a far cry from the oratory vision-making at conferences. Now that the global gold rush has ended, the belief that the American way of doing deals is portable is being upended.
Fragmented world
We are left with a fragmented world where capital moves not so freely, the problems of politics and regulation are more prominent and investing in emerging markets becomes what it always has been: the province of more specialized investors who are in tune with the political and regulatory requirements. Regardless, the easy riches that many thought these countries would bring are now far out of sight.
And the winner in all of this is likely to be the much-maligned United States, where the economic conditions and regulatory environment first gave birth to these deal makers.
This is not to say that there will still not be global deal-making or that American multinationals will not continue to expand abroad. Of course, there will still be profits in deals overseas. But the vision that deal-making will instantly and seamlessly go global is increasingly exposed as one that was more a fairy tale than reality.- IHT/NYT
If you’ve been anywhere near a Wall Street conference in the last five years, you know the drill. Deal makers bemoan the United States as a mature and overregulated economy. They talk about heading abroad, as emerging market economies leave us far behind. To listen to them, one might think the rest of the world was a paradise out of “Atlas Shrugged,” where capital flows and where private equity, investment banks and other investors can freely seek opportunities.
So what country is No. 1 in initial public offerings so far this year? Yes, it is the United States, according to Renaissance Capital, with 75 I.P.O.’s raising $39 billion in total. Compare this activity with China, where 41 I.P.O.’s raised just $8.1 billion.
M&AS
And in mergers and acquisitions? Again, it is the United States, with 53 percent of the worldwide deal volume, up from 51 percent from last year, according to Dealogic. For investment banks, this means that the United States has a 46 percent share of the $63 billion in worldwide investment banking revenue, up from 34.6 percent in 2009.
With the slowdown in once-hot emerging markets, the tide is going out, baring all of the problems and issues associated with global deal-making.
China is a prime example. Huge amounts of foreign and state investment produced an economic miracle. And in that time, wealth was there to be had.
But let’s be clear about where that wealth came from. In the United States, deal makers make money primarily by buying underperforming assets, adding some financial wizardry and riding any improvements in the stock market. Sometimes, they get lucky by making a quick profit, but often private equity works to squeeze out inefficiencies and make operating improvements in companies and then takes them public a few years later.
China's situation
In China, what increasingly appears to have been a stock market and asset bubble spurred by hundreds of billions in direct investment has created some spectacular early profits for deal makers. The private equity firm Carlyle Group, for example, has made an estimated $4.4 billion on an investment in China Pacific Insurance, which it took public on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange.
But now, with the Chinese I.P.O. market at a virtual standstill and the Shanghai market down more than 30 percent from its high last year, that avenue to riches is over. People are starting to say that investment in China resembles a “No Exit” sign.
Deal makers are left with a back-to-basics approach that looks to make money from companies through economic growth or improving their performance. Yet most of these investments are made with state actors and minority positions, meaning that there may be little opportunity to actually do anything more than sit and wait and hope. And you know what they say about hope as a strategy.
It appears that deal makers are starting to realize the problem. Foreign direct investment in China was down 3.67 percent from last year to $9.6 billion, and it is likely to remain on a downward trend.
And China has been among the friendliest places for deal makers. Other emerging markets have been less accommodating. Take India, which has been criticized for excessive regulation, high taxes and ownership prohibitions. David Bonderman, the head of the private equity giant TPG Capital, recently said that “we stay away from places that have impossible governments and impossible tax regimes, which means sayonara to India.”
Foreign issues
The comment about India highlights another problem with foreign deal-making: it’s foreign. Sometimes, the political winds change and local governments that initially welcomed investment change their minds.
South Korea, for example, invited foreign capital to invest in its battered financial sector after the Asian currency crisis. But when Lone Star Investments was about to reap billions in profits on an investment in Korea Exchange Bank, a legal battle almost a decade long erupted as Korean government officials accused the fund of vulture investing.
And the political problems are sometimes not directed at foreign investors. South Africa, for example, is undergoing the kind of political turmoil that can stop all foreign investment in its tracks over treatment of its workers and continuing income inequality. Things are not much better in the more mature economies.
Economic doldrums
Europe is in the economic doldrums, and its governments are increasingly protectionist of both jobs and industry. France, for example, recently threatened to nationalize a factory owned by ArcelorMittal, which sought to shut down two furnaces.
The national minister said the company was “not welcome.” It’s hard to see a deal maker profiting from buying an inefficient enterprise that it can’t clean up without risking national censure.
Buying at a low is the lifeblood of any investment strategy — but this assumes that there will be an uptick, and on the Continent, that is uncertain given the state of Greece and the other indebted economies in Southern Europe.
This is all a far cry from the oratory vision-making at conferences. Now that the global gold rush has ended, the belief that the American way of doing deals is portable is being upended.
Fragmented world
We are left with a fragmented world where capital moves not so freely, the problems of politics and regulation are more prominent and investing in emerging markets becomes what it always has been: the province of more specialized investors who are in tune with the political and regulatory requirements. Regardless, the easy riches that many thought these countries would bring are now far out of sight.
And the winner in all of this is likely to be the much-maligned United States, where the economic conditions and regulatory environment first gave birth to these deal makers.
This is not to say that there will still not be global deal-making or that American multinationals will not continue to expand abroad. Of course, there will still be profits in deals overseas. But the vision that deal-making will instantly and seamlessly go global is increasingly exposed as one that was more a fairy tale than reality.- IHT/NYT
Steven M. Davidoff, a professor at the Michael E. Moritz College of Law at Ohio State University, is the author of “Gods at War: Shotgun Takeovers, Government by Deal and the Private Equity Implosion.” E-mail: dealprof@nytimes.com | Twitter: @StevenDavidoff
Friday, December 21, 2012
How to ask for a pay rise and get a bonus?
Successful ways to get an increment or bonus - Do not be boastful about your achievements or downplay the role of your colleagues
IT'S now December and year-end is just round the corner. It's also time for reflection about what you have achieved in your current job and what your plans are for next year in terms of your career path.
Taking some time to make such plans is a great way to ensure that you have set yourself in the right direction and how a well-crafted road map can lead you to your outcomes or objectives.
As with every plan, you need to give yourself some private time to set your thoughts in the right direction. Start with choosing a quiet place and give yourself ample time to relax and focus on how the current year has been and what lies ahead that you wish to see happening. Let's look at how you can successfully ask for a pay rise from your bosses if you had met and exceeded your targets and agreed KPIs.
b. It can be a group project or one which you did individually
b. List down your role in the project e.g. principal driver or customer liaison person, risk analyst planner (your actual role in the group)
b. It could even be completed in a few days time
c. If there were cost investment required which is beyond the time spent on carrying out this programme, place the cost into the column e.g. marketing budget of RM12,000.
b. What were the challenges or issues that were required to be resolved?
c. What was the sales target in terms of revenue that needed to be realised?
b. List down the measurable results to be effective e.g.
i. If time was an essence, completion within or earlier than the duration expected or given
ii. If revenue was the outcome, place the amount/value into your outcomes
iii. If cost savings was involved, list down the amount /value saved
What is very important is that the information in that list must be real and a true reflection of what was achieved. Do not list down information which you cannot prove or which is untrue. Be mindful that it's not about having a long grocery list but a list which is impactful in terms of outcomes and results. If there was nothing significant in that month, go to the next month and only list the effective and efficient details in your list.
If your company does not have a performance review/appraisal fixed for year-end, set an appointment with your immediate boss to have that discussion. Be proactive in your approach.
During the discussion, have an open mind that your list may be challenged. Approach your discussion with your boss on a professional manner and never argue your points.
Be diplomatic and highlight the points that you have in your list. Reaffirm your points with facts and in some cases, walk your boss through how it was achieved and the process that was involved.
You may not be the only subordinate your boss has, so, he may not recall each and every project of all his subordinates or the results attached to it. It is advisable to have the discussion with a state of mind that you are showcasing your achievements and not out to prove your boss wrong or to boast of your achievements.
If you know that you have achieved many milestones and have been a star performer, always be humble in your demeanour. Do not be boastful about your achievements or downplay the role of your colleagues on any group projects.
Group projects are always achievable as a result of teamwork no matter how small a role someone else plays. It would be good to share credit on some of the successes by naming some colleagues who had played a critical part in your project list. This reflects your maturity and openness to share credit where it's due. It also shows that you have leadership qualities and values teamwork.
When you ask for a pay rise, you also need to be mindful of the company's performance for the year. Ask yourself if the company has achieved better performance results compared to last year as a benchmark or if your company has achieved the performance results/profits that was targeted at the start of the year based on your CEO/management's direction for the year.
Look internally at your achievement and do a quick Conclusion (as per the list requirements above) on your progress month on month and if possible, compare that with last year's progress. If your company has suffered losses this year, generally it is advisable not to ask for a pay rise. Employees who show loyalty to a company during challenging times will be valued and there are also other ways to measure how the company and its management treat you beyond the pay rise; rewards and recognition (extra annual leave, awards),
good health plan, training and development programme which provided upskilling and personal growth.
Do some research on salary ranges before asking for a pay rise as your pay rise needs to be realistic and based on market rate. Never ask for a pay rise that is unreasonable or which you know the company cannot agree to. Be willing to accept a compromise during the discussion and open yourself to different solutions offered by the company.
As much as we wish to have what our heart desires, there are times we have to face the reality of rejection. If you are successful in getting that pay rise, congratulations but to those who are not successful, do not accept it as a failure or an end to a means.
Things happen for a reason and it may be a call for you to take charge of your own achievements, on your skill sets and, at times, it may be reasons beyond your control such as the company's poor performance as a whole.
Melissa feels that those
who invest in their careers do not view salary as the only priority but
the job satisfaction and meaningful friendships forged with colleagues
and bosses as critical aspects for long-term career fulfilment.
IT'S now December and year-end is just round the corner. It's also time for reflection about what you have achieved in your current job and what your plans are for next year in terms of your career path.
Taking some time to make such plans is a great way to ensure that you have set yourself in the right direction and how a well-crafted road map can lead you to your outcomes or objectives.
As with every plan, you need to give yourself some private time to set your thoughts in the right direction. Start with choosing a quiet place and give yourself ample time to relax and focus on how the current year has been and what lies ahead that you wish to see happening. Let's look at how you can successfully ask for a pay rise from your bosses if you had met and exceeded your targets and agreed KPIs.
- >Current year reflection is a measure of your achievements
- >Crafting the list of achievements for the year
- >Month
- >Projects and assignment
b. It can be a group project or one which you did individually
- >People involved
b. List down your role in the project e.g. principal driver or customer liaison person, risk analyst planner (your actual role in the group)
- >Timelines/cost involved
b. It could even be completed in a few days time
c. If there were cost investment required which is beyond the time spent on carrying out this programme, place the cost into the column e.g. marketing budget of RM12,000.
- >Objective of the project and assignment
b. What were the challenges or issues that were required to be resolved?
c. What was the sales target in terms of revenue that needed to be realised?
- >Outcome/results achieved
b. List down the measurable results to be effective e.g.
i. If time was an essence, completion within or earlier than the duration expected or given
ii. If revenue was the outcome, place the amount/value into your outcomes
iii. If cost savings was involved, list down the amount /value saved
- >Conclusion
What is very important is that the information in that list must be real and a true reflection of what was achieved. Do not list down information which you cannot prove or which is untrue. Be mindful that it's not about having a long grocery list but a list which is impactful in terms of outcomes and results. If there was nothing significant in that month, go to the next month and only list the effective and efficient details in your list.
If your company does not have a performance review/appraisal fixed for year-end, set an appointment with your immediate boss to have that discussion. Be proactive in your approach.
During the discussion, have an open mind that your list may be challenged. Approach your discussion with your boss on a professional manner and never argue your points.
Be diplomatic and highlight the points that you have in your list. Reaffirm your points with facts and in some cases, walk your boss through how it was achieved and the process that was involved.
You may not be the only subordinate your boss has, so, he may not recall each and every project of all his subordinates or the results attached to it. It is advisable to have the discussion with a state of mind that you are showcasing your achievements and not out to prove your boss wrong or to boast of your achievements.
If you know that you have achieved many milestones and have been a star performer, always be humble in your demeanour. Do not be boastful about your achievements or downplay the role of your colleagues on any group projects.
Group projects are always achievable as a result of teamwork no matter how small a role someone else plays. It would be good to share credit on some of the successes by naming some colleagues who had played a critical part in your project list. This reflects your maturity and openness to share credit where it's due. It also shows that you have leadership qualities and values teamwork.
When you ask for a pay rise, you also need to be mindful of the company's performance for the year. Ask yourself if the company has achieved better performance results compared to last year as a benchmark or if your company has achieved the performance results/profits that was targeted at the start of the year based on your CEO/management's direction for the year.
Look internally at your achievement and do a quick Conclusion (as per the list requirements above) on your progress month on month and if possible, compare that with last year's progress. If your company has suffered losses this year, generally it is advisable not to ask for a pay rise. Employees who show loyalty to a company during challenging times will be valued and there are also other ways to measure how the company and its management treat you beyond the pay rise; rewards and recognition (extra annual leave, awards),
good health plan, training and development programme which provided upskilling and personal growth.
Do some research on salary ranges before asking for a pay rise as your pay rise needs to be realistic and based on market rate. Never ask for a pay rise that is unreasonable or which you know the company cannot agree to. Be willing to accept a compromise during the discussion and open yourself to different solutions offered by the company.
As much as we wish to have what our heart desires, there are times we have to face the reality of rejection. If you are successful in getting that pay rise, congratulations but to those who are not successful, do not accept it as a failure or an end to a means.
Things happen for a reason and it may be a call for you to take charge of your own achievements, on your skill sets and, at times, it may be reasons beyond your control such as the company's poor performance as a whole.
Reading opens up minds
BACK in my first year when I was asked to read cases by my professor,
my immediate reaction was to ask how many pages were there to read.
My professor replied: “There’s no harm reading more.”
I also remember attending a scholarship interview where I was asked to give an account of the books I had read.
Proudly I answered: “I did not read any books besides the academic textbooks.”
It is really depressing and shameful that I took pride of my disinterest towards the habit of reading.
This may appear unusual for a law student like me to recount such a disinterest but I am afraid to say that many of my fellow Malaysian friends share such a disinterest, too.
Many students read for the sake of passing their examinations. Many spend time on computer games and working adults may find it tiring to read outside working hours.
As for myself, I turned impatient, disappointed, annoyed and even regretted choosing law as I later found out that I had to read hundreds of pages of cases every week (putting aside the textbooks, commentaries and other journal articles).
Over the years while in law school, I cultivated the habit of reading.
It was hard at the beginning when I had to flip through the dictionary to check the meaning of the words I did not understand, that I lost patience reading the countless pages of books and needless to say I shed many tears in my struggle to finish my law studies.
However, one thing I can assure you is that the sufferings bore fruit. Indeed, they were rewarding. I am no longer sheltered and ignorant.
My general knowledge and vocabulary have increased and with it, my ability to communicate. With the increased knowledge, I can voice an opinion if needed.
The habit of reading opened up my mind that I am now able to see things more objectively than before.
The treasure of knowledge also taught me to keep an open mind and not to accept another’s views blindly.
Reading news and non-fiction illuminates the world for us and reading fiction gives us what non-fiction cannot.
Through reading we travel and through books we find treasures. In those wanderings we find humanity, through the characters we find knowledge.
As how human beings need to be fed, knowledge serves as nourishment for our minds.
Reading opens up the door of knowledge, an important treasure for our country to achieve the 2020 Vision.
So, I urge all of you to cultivate the habit of reading, for yourselves and our country.
JUNE LOH Kulim, Kedah
My professor replied: “There’s no harm reading more.”
I also remember attending a scholarship interview where I was asked to give an account of the books I had read.
Proudly I answered: “I did not read any books besides the academic textbooks.”
It is really depressing and shameful that I took pride of my disinterest towards the habit of reading.
This may appear unusual for a law student like me to recount such a disinterest but I am afraid to say that many of my fellow Malaysian friends share such a disinterest, too.
Many students read for the sake of passing their examinations. Many spend time on computer games and working adults may find it tiring to read outside working hours.
As for myself, I turned impatient, disappointed, annoyed and even regretted choosing law as I later found out that I had to read hundreds of pages of cases every week (putting aside the textbooks, commentaries and other journal articles).
Over the years while in law school, I cultivated the habit of reading.
It was hard at the beginning when I had to flip through the dictionary to check the meaning of the words I did not understand, that I lost patience reading the countless pages of books and needless to say I shed many tears in my struggle to finish my law studies.
However, one thing I can assure you is that the sufferings bore fruit. Indeed, they were rewarding. I am no longer sheltered and ignorant.
My general knowledge and vocabulary have increased and with it, my ability to communicate. With the increased knowledge, I can voice an opinion if needed.
The habit of reading opened up my mind that I am now able to see things more objectively than before.
The treasure of knowledge also taught me to keep an open mind and not to accept another’s views blindly.
Reading news and non-fiction illuminates the world for us and reading fiction gives us what non-fiction cannot.
Through reading we travel and through books we find treasures. In those wanderings we find humanity, through the characters we find knowledge.
As how human beings need to be fed, knowledge serves as nourishment for our minds.
Reading opens up the door of knowledge, an important treasure for our country to achieve the 2020 Vision.
So, I urge all of you to cultivate the habit of reading, for yourselves and our country.
JUNE LOH Kulim, Kedah
Thursday, December 20, 2012
Get rid of illegal casinos gambling now !
SINGAPORE: Police have arrested five men in a raid on an illegal gambling den in a private apartment at Geylang Road.
I REFER to “Bet illegal casinos can be weeded out” (see below). They should not be allowed to thrive. They are a nuisance and must go.
I hope the enforcement agencies work on this immediately. Stop giving excuses that this cannot be done.
Such nefarious ways and activities must be put to an end. Have the political will to do so and we will see to their demise.
What is also shocking is how illegal massage parlours, budget hotels, nightclubs, pubs, video arcades and other unhealthy businesses have cropped up of late?
Did the state governments give permission for them to operate? Whatever it is, please see to it that they stop functioning.
Their presence is bad. Trust me, nothing good comes from casinos and gambling.
Gambling is addictive and leads to compulsive gambling problems and unhealthy obsessions; it promotes crime, sin, stupidity, laziness, arrogance, greed, selfishness, entitlement and neglect of one’s family, among others.
BULBIR SINGH Seremban
IT is known as the street that never sleeps. And for all the wrong reasons.
Because of the proliferation of gambling outlets, businesses along the same street, both legal and illegal, operate non-stop to cater to the demands of the gamblers.
In another part of the Klang Valley, one road is regarded as the hottest gambling spot in town, with 20 outlets along a single stretch.
The Star's investigation into the e-gambling dens in Klang, Selayang, Batu Caves, Kepong and Petaling Jaya reveal that these casinos in the streets thrive because the authorities turn a blind eye to what is going on under their jurisdictions.
Enforcement is lax even when these outlets in highly-popular zones are so easily identified.
We are not talking about illegal activities that operate in the boondocks, where their locations are tightly-kept secrets and you may need special passwords to gain access.
As our expose today on similar outlets in Penang reveals, we are talking about such illegal activities in two of the most developed states in the country.
The local authorities and enforcement agencies are certainly well-equipped to deal with situations like these.
The modus operandi seems simple enough. By day, they are typical business outlets, but by night they transform into bustling gambling dens.
The enforcers should be working round the clock to close them down.
The real action happens after dark, when not only gamblers head to these places, but also others seeking other services, like sex, to unwind after a hard day's work.
One law enforcement official claims that the operators of the illegal e-casinos play “hide-and-seek” with the authorities and often disappear before raids are conducted.
Meanwhile, the local authorities claim that they cannot do anything about the rising gambling menace either because the residents do not complain officially or that the other enforcement agencies are not doing their part.
While that may be the case, such scenarios are common and should not be used as an excuse not to take the necessary action.
The enforcement officials can station themselves in these areas.
The licensing authorities can shut down even the legitimate businesses in the daytime if they have evidence that they are being used for illegal activities at night.
Rather than blame one another over the lack of action, everyone can, and should, work as a team to ensure that our streets come alive, in the day or at night, for only the right reasons.
Otherwise, casinos in the streets will simply spawn crime in the streets.
Related posts:
Video games turned casinos gambling in Penang
Cyber crooks target gamers; E-gambling dens menace, raid in Penang ... Cyber crooks target gamers; E-gambling dens menace, raid in Penang, etc
I REFER to “Bet illegal casinos can be weeded out” (see below). They should not be allowed to thrive. They are a nuisance and must go.
I hope the enforcement agencies work on this immediately. Stop giving excuses that this cannot be done.
Such nefarious ways and activities must be put to an end. Have the political will to do so and we will see to their demise.
What is also shocking is how illegal massage parlours, budget hotels, nightclubs, pubs, video arcades and other unhealthy businesses have cropped up of late?
Did the state governments give permission for them to operate? Whatever it is, please see to it that they stop functioning.
Their presence is bad. Trust me, nothing good comes from casinos and gambling.
Gambling is addictive and leads to compulsive gambling problems and unhealthy obsessions; it promotes crime, sin, stupidity, laziness, arrogance, greed, selfishness, entitlement and neglect of one’s family, among others.
BULBIR SINGH Seremban
Bet illegal casinos can be weeded out
IT is known as the street that never sleeps. And for all the wrong reasons.
Because of the proliferation of gambling outlets, businesses along the same street, both legal and illegal, operate non-stop to cater to the demands of the gamblers.
In another part of the Klang Valley, one road is regarded as the hottest gambling spot in town, with 20 outlets along a single stretch.
The Star's investigation into the e-gambling dens in Klang, Selayang, Batu Caves, Kepong and Petaling Jaya reveal that these casinos in the streets thrive because the authorities turn a blind eye to what is going on under their jurisdictions.
Enforcement is lax even when these outlets in highly-popular zones are so easily identified.
We are not talking about illegal activities that operate in the boondocks, where their locations are tightly-kept secrets and you may need special passwords to gain access.
As our expose today on similar outlets in Penang reveals, we are talking about such illegal activities in two of the most developed states in the country.
The local authorities and enforcement agencies are certainly well-equipped to deal with situations like these.
The modus operandi seems simple enough. By day, they are typical business outlets, but by night they transform into bustling gambling dens.
The enforcers should be working round the clock to close them down.
The real action happens after dark, when not only gamblers head to these places, but also others seeking other services, like sex, to unwind after a hard day's work.
One law enforcement official claims that the operators of the illegal e-casinos play “hide-and-seek” with the authorities and often disappear before raids are conducted.
Meanwhile, the local authorities claim that they cannot do anything about the rising gambling menace either because the residents do not complain officially or that the other enforcement agencies are not doing their part.
While that may be the case, such scenarios are common and should not be used as an excuse not to take the necessary action.
The enforcement officials can station themselves in these areas.
The licensing authorities can shut down even the legitimate businesses in the daytime if they have evidence that they are being used for illegal activities at night.
Rather than blame one another over the lack of action, everyone can, and should, work as a team to ensure that our streets come alive, in the day or at night, for only the right reasons.
Otherwise, casinos in the streets will simply spawn crime in the streets.
Related posts:
Video games turned casinos gambling in Penang
Cyber crooks target gamers; E-gambling dens menace, raid in Penang ... Cyber crooks target gamers; E-gambling dens menace, raid in Penang, etc
Wednesday, December 19, 2012
Video games turned casinos gambling in Penang
Huge gambling slot machines draw punters to illegal centres
Not so innocent after all: One of the video games arcades that offer gambling slot machines in Sungai Nibong.GEORGE TOWN: Some video games arcades in Penang are doubling as mini casinos where punters can try their luck on huge gambling slot machines.
One, in Bandar Baru Air Itam here, looks just like any other video games arcade as children, women and the elderly can be seen having a fun time inside the premises.
But it turns out that the main draw at the place are the huge slot machines which can be played by six punters at a time.
For RM10, a punter is given 20 tokens worth 100 credits to gamble with.
At one machine, punters earn credits if they are able to hit targets.
A check revealed that several video games arcades and amusement centres here as well as in Sungai Nibong, Macalister Road and Bandar Baru Air Itam have such slot machines apart from the usual video games for children.
Some even have snooker tables and indoor golf simulation games to make them one-stop entertainment outlets.
These premises are equipped with closed-circuit television (CCTV) cameras and some have tontos (lookouts) stationed outside to sound the alarm if there are enforcement authorities.
Some of the premises are located in secluded shoplots and have tinted windows to avoid detection. There are also operators who only admit regular customers.
Many punters even bring along their spouse and children. While they gamble, their spouse and children play the usual video games.
A punter, who declined to be named, said winning about RM30 a day was enough to pay for three meals.
“But you must know the timing, technique and tactic to win lah,” he said.
Penang police chief Deputy Comm Datuk Abdul Rahim Hanafi said they had “zero tolerance” against the operators of such illegal centres.
He urged those with information to contact the police hotline at 04-2691999.
“Please, furnish us with details of the premises that offer such activities. We will immediately launch a crackdown,” he said. “I won't allow gambling activities in Penang as it will surely cause social problems.”
Penang municipal councillor Iszuree Ibrahim believed that video game arcades could have abused their licences to run such outlets.
“We will not hesitate to revoke their licences and take stern action against them,” he said, adding that the licences had to be renewed quarterly. - The Star
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)